🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misreading of the situation. The true danger confronting Europe is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening disparity stems from superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, where does Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a contest between two between the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, a factor that caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was once met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: high-quality workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, if it fails to take decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.